Mr. Schlosser provided some background on the development of the Fit for Duty policy, which was proposed to replace the County's 2007-01 Policy regarding Drugs and Alcohol in the workplace. He noted the policy review was timely and prudent, considering the legislative changes related to cannabis.
Mr. Schlosser advised that in addition to the policy, there will be some training that will be required by the County supervisors so that they may be better equipped to address any issues that may arise within their staff complement. Industry experts as well as peer groups were consulted during the development of the proposed policy.
Mr. Antaya questioned the availability of tests and whether these would be conducted by the employer? Mr. Schlosser indicated that any testing would be completed by the employer with the assistance of professionals in that field, with the union present as well.
Mr. Bachetti questioned whether the policy would cover other impairments, not due to substances, such as mental health issues or fatigue. Mr. Schlosser indicated that there are other provisions that would cover instances of mental health.
Mr. Santos suggested amending the definitions section to include 'Fit-for-Duty' as opposed to what is included now as 'un-fit-for-duty'.